Ambystoma cingulatum Cope, 1867 [1868]
Frosted Flatwoods Salamander
Federal Protection: Listed Threatened
State Protection: Threatened
Global Rank: G2
State Rank: S1
Element Locations Tracked in Biotics: Yes
SWAP 2015 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN): Yes
SWAP 2025 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN): Yes
2025 SGCN Priority Tier: Highest Conservation Concern
Element Occurrences (EOs) in Georgia: 53
Habitat Summary for element in Georgia: Pine flatwoods; moist savannas; isolated cypress/gum ponds
The frosted flatwoods salamander has black to dark brown background coloration, and is typically patterned with grayish-green random flecking, forming a net-like pattern on the back, sides, head, and tail resembling lichen-like markings or “frosting;” their undersides have tiny random flecking resembling salt and pepper The body is slender relative to other mole salamanders (genus Ambystoma); the head is relatively small, and the tail is quite fat. Adults are typically 12 - 15 cm (4.5 - 6 inches) in total length. The broad-headed, bushy-gilled larva is very distinctive with a prominent tan or beige stripe running the length of the otherwise chocolate-brown body. The larva also has a dark brown stripe through each eye, extending from the nostril to the gills.
Adult frosted flatwoods salamanders may be confused with the members of the slimy salamander complex(Plethodon glutinosus) at first glance as the historical distribution of the frosted flatwoods salamander in Georgia overlaps the ranges of several slimy salamander species (Plethodon glutinosus, P. grobmani, P. ocmulgee, P. savannah, and P. variolatus) and adults can be found in the same terrestrial habitats; however, slimy salamanders differ in appearance by having unconnected, widely scattered light spots on the back and sides and a groove between each nostril and the upper lip. Besides having non-overlapping geographic distributions (see the description of its Range below), the frosted flatwoods salamander can be distinguished from the reticulated flatwoods salamander (Ambystoma bishopi) by slight differences in general appearance and in having a more slender, delicate build (definitive constriction at the neck and a more slender tail); the reticulated flatwoods salamander has an uderside pattern resembling salt and pepper rather than discrete white spots, and its dorsal pattern is more of a reticulated net-like pattern rather than the lichen-like pattern of the frosted flatwoods salamander.
This salamander is endemic to mesic flatwoods habitats within the vanishing longleaf pine-wiregrass community. Slash pine was incorrectly reported in early species accounts as a commonly associated tree species within its non-breeding habitat. Nearly all flatwoods salamander sites currently dominated by slash pine have been converted from historic longleaf pine stands. Pine flatwoods are fire-dependent communities, requiring periodic burns to promote grasses and forbs, while limiting shrubs and hardwoods. Breeding sites are typically shallow, seasonally inundated cypress and/or swamp tupelo ponds or "domes," although flooded borrow pits, roadside ditches, and deep firebreaks are occasionally used. Breeding sites are also dependent on periodic dry season fires, which maintain an open canopy conducive to the luxuriant growth of emergent and submerged grasses, sedges, and forbs necessary for sheltering the aquatic larvae. The historical distribution of the frosted flatwoods salamander in Georgia spans areas of flat topography (0-2% slope) within portions of the Vidalia Uplands, Bacon Terraces, Okefenokee Plains, Okefenokee Swamp (uplands), and the Sea Island Flatwoods ecoregions. Ephemeral depressional wetlands, occurring throughout these regions, that are embedded within a typically open canopied upland pine forest landscape are utilized as breeding ponds by frosted flatwoods salamanders. These wetlands are depression relicts from formerly submerged tidal systems, such as estuaries and salt marshes; in particular, within the Sea Island Flatwoods Ecoregion, large expanses of wetland features developed behind ancient barrier islands and dune systems along four separate ancient shorelines (ancient barrier island sequences and associated marine estuary sediments): Wicomico, Penholoway, Talbot, and Pamico shorelines (modern barrier islands and coastal marshes, as while as permanent wetland features such the Okefenokee Swamp are excluded).
Adults are known to eat earthworms, but likely consume other invertebrates as well. Larvae eat a variety of aquatic invertebrates, especially crustaceans such as amphipods and isopods. Captive larvae readily eat small tadpoles and may also do so in the wild.
As adults, flatwoods salamanders are primarily fossorial, living in burrows just below the soil surface. Triggered by rain-laden cold fronts during the fall and early winter breeding season, mature salamanders nocturnally migrate to isolated wetlands en masse. Movements of more than 1.6 km (1 mile) from a breeding site to a terrestrial retreat have been reported. Following mating, female flatwoods salamanders deposit up to 225 eggs singly or in small groups in the dry portions of the pond basin or in grassy areas at the pond margin, usually under leaf litter or logs, at the bases of grass clumps, or at the entrance of crayfish burrows. In most years, repeated rain events eventually fill the wetland and inundate the developing eggs, inducing hatching. However, in some years insufficient rainfall following egg deposition prevents complete inundation, resulting in few eggs hatching and low recruitment. Unlike wetlands that dry completely on a cyclic basis, wetland habitats that have permanent surface water and wetlands associated with surface drainageways usually contain predatory fish. Flatwoods salamander larvae, like larvae of many other amphibian species, need a predatory fish-free environment to survive. Frequent drying of their breeding ponds assures that populations of large predatory fish cannot survive from year to year within these wetlands, even if occasionally introduced during flood events. Larvae are primarily inactive during the day but will emerge from the sheltering vegetation at night to feed. A developmental period of 11 - 18 weeks follows hatching, and larvae typically metamorphose in March or April.
Long-term conservation strategies within Georgia and throughout the distribution of both flatwoods salamander species should not only focus on regular monitoring of known populations (i.e., species presence & abundance and habitat condition), but on locating additional populations through the identification and sampling of suitable habitat through the development of species distribution models and the use of other remote sensing data sources such as LiDAR. Flatwoods salamanders are best surveyed for as larvae, where they can be dip-netted or minnow-trapped from breeding ponds. Aquatic surveys should focus on areas with abundant emergent and submerged plants. Adults are very difficult to find, but are occasionally encountered on rainy fall and winter nights by slowly driving roads that cross between their upland habitat and breeding wetlands. Drift fences equipped with funnel traps and placed adjacent to breeding ponds can intercept migrating adults, but are costly and labor-intensive. Recent research has demonstrated that environmental DNA (eDNA) can detect the presence of flatwoods salamanders and other imperiled pond breeding amphibians even when not detected through traditional physical dip-netting larval surveys.
This species is restricted to the Coastal Plain of Georgia, Florida, and Alabama, but in Georgia, is known to be extant within only a single site. The elusive habits of the flatwoods salamander have posed an impediment to achieving a complete understanding of its geographic distribution and variation. Nearly 85 years following its discovery (1867), based on observed variations in pattern, coloration, and morphology, two forms of the complex were designated as subspecies (1950), one from the Atlantic Coastal Plain (reticulated salamander, A. cingulatum cingulatum) and the other from the Gulf Coastal Plain (frosted salamander, A. cingulatum bishopi). Just 15 years later (1965), these subspecific designations were peremptorily dismissed based largely on conjecture that the reported variations were inconsistent and the distribution of the flatwoods salamander across the Coastal Plain was contiguous permitting gene flow across the range and preventing speciation. Although recent molecular research (2007) has confirmed genetic differences in the subspecies designated nearly 60 years earlier representing divergence sufficient for separate species designation, the observed geographic separation of these two forms by watershed was arbitrarily disregarded; instead a river system was suggested to be a barrier to gene flow, thus separating the respective species, the reticulated flatwoods salamander (A. bishopi) to the west and the frosted flatwoods salamander (A. cingulatum) to the east of the Flint-Apalachicola rivers. This theory however fails to consider the position and distribution of suitable habitat across the landscape and presents one river course as a barrier to movement while ignoring numerous others, many of equal or greater order (e.g., the Escambia, Chicola, Chattahoochee, Altamaha, Savannah, and Edisto rivers, just to name a few). In 2012, molecular researchers using available flatwoods salamander tissue samples from across the Coastal Plain identified two genetically distinctive clades within A. cingulatum, purportedly separated in Georgia and Florida by the Suwannee River yet the lack of significant genetic variation between specimens from South Carolina and those from portions Florida and Georgia suggest that Savannah River has not been a major historical barrier to gene flow. It is unlikely that any river within the Coastal Plain of southeastern North America has been within its current course long enough within the relevant geologic or evolutionary time frame to act as a significant barrier to gene flow. A more likely explanation for the observed genetic divergence within and between species of the flatwoods salamander complex, is that a more permanent landscape feature or features creates such a barrier. The Pelham Escarpment rises as much as 100 feet in elevation, runs from the southwest corner of Georgia for over 100 miles separating the low limestone Dougherty Plain on its eastern flank from Tifton Uplands characterized by well-developed dendritic drainages with narrow and rounded interfluves rising 50 to 200 feet above the narrow valley floors. Such rolling topography does not harbor the typically low sloped flatwoods or the isolated wetlands required as breeding habitat for flatwoods salamanders and thus is a barrier to dispersal and genetic exchange between the two species. Unlike most other rivers of the Coastal Plain, the Apalachicola Basin is positioned within a rift dating to the late Jurassic (~150 million years ago), making this river course a relatively permanent landscape feature. Thus, the reticulated flatwoods salamander (A. bishopi) is restricted to the west of the Pelham Escarpment in Georgia and to the west of the Apalachicola River in Florida, while the distribution of the frosted flatwoods salamander (A. cingulatum) is restricted to the east of Tifton Uplands in Georgia and the east of the Apalachicola River in Florida. It is more likely that the clades of A. cingulatum are partitioned by drainage (e.g., Atlantic and Gulf drainages) rather than by the Suwannee River for the same reasons described earlier.
Of the 51 historical occurrences of the frosted flatwoods salamander in Georgia, only one pond is known to have produced larvae within the past decade. . Any species with such a reduced range is vulnerable to extinction. Habitat loss has been the primary cause of this salamander's demise throughout its range. Agriculture and silviculture have eliminated the vast majority of the once widespread longleaf pine flatwoods community in Georgia and elsewhere. Because pine flatwoods are typically underlain by semi-hydric soils, forestry practices often involve altering the hydrology by ditching, draining, and/or bedding. These activities are detrimental to both the fossorial and aquatic existence of this species and may interfere with successful migration. Ditching and draining isolated wetlands used by breeding flatwoods salamanders significantly shortens their hydroperiod, halting larval development prior to metamorphosis. Apparent increases in the frequency and duration of changes in rainfall patterns during the last 50 years related to global climate change (i.e., within the southeastern United States, La Niña events resulting in droughts and El Niño events resulting extreme rainfall) coupled with extensive habitat fragmentation across the Coastal Plain have presented the most significant challenge to this species’ continued persistence to date. While shifts in weather and rainfall patterns have certainly occurred over the millennia, historically these changes were attenuated by the resiliency of an unfragmented landscape; in a given area, slight variations in wetland hydroperiod and differences in interconnectedness of wetland features meant that suitable habitat conditions were almost always present somewhere on the landscape for successful breeding, and larval recruitment and survival. The advent of mechanized intensive forestry practices in the 1950s across the Coastal Plain resulted in a dramatic decrease in suitable upland flatwoods habitat; fire suppression on the landscape and exclusion of fire from isolated wetlands, particularly during seasons when wetland basins are typically dry has resulted in increasingly degraded breeding habitats for this species. Consequently, the occurrence of both suitable upland with suitable embedded wetland habitats have become exceptionally rare on the landscape. Extensive efforts to identify suitable habitat in Georgia from 2002 – 2010 were unsuccessful, and during many of these seasons rainfall patterns were not conducive for locating larval within breeding ponds. Even where habitat has been specifically managed through the use of lighting-season prescribed fire and thus maintained in a suitable condition for flatwoods salamanders, a number of prolonged periods of drought within the last 20 years (e.g., 1998-2001) have negatively impacted successful recruitment of young and resulted in the extirpation of some of the last remaining occurrences of this species in Georgia. Perkinsus, a protozoan-like organism known to infect and kill larvae of certain other amphibians, was detected at the one breeding pond on Mayhaw Wildlife Management Area during a particularly wet year. The potential impact of Perkinsus on flatwoods salamanders is unknown. Although not detected in North America, an emerging infectious disease, salamander chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans [Bsal]) is of concern for many salamander species world-wide; fortunately, salamanders of the genus Ambystoma are resistant and non-carriers of this often lethal pathogen.
| Threat 1 | Threat 2 | Threat 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Threat | Climate change & severe weather | Natural system modifications | Natural system modifications |
| Specific Threat | Droughts | Fire & fire suppression | Dams & water management/use |
Protected populations occur at Ft. Stewart Military Reservation, , but apparently have become extirpated from formerly occupied wetlands at the Townsend Bombing Range. This species was listed as Threatened under the Endangered Species Act (1999).
With only one knownpopulation of frosted flatwoods salamander in Georgia, forest management plans of occupied habitats should consider the conservation of this species a top priority. Avoidance of mechanical disturbance to the soil and discontinuing practices which may result in adverse hydrological impacts to breeding sites are critical, especially within at least a 1.6 km (1 mile) radius from the edge of all known breeding wetlands (Appendix I, II). Periodic lightning-season burns should be prescribed in pinelands inhabited by flatwoods salamanders, and these fires allowed to burn into isolated wetlands. Known breeding sites should be annually monitored.
Goin, C. J. 1950. A study of the salamander, Ambystoma cingulatum, with the description of a new subspecies. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 31(14): 299-321.
Jensen, J. B., and D. J. Stevenson. 2008. Flatwoods salamander Ambystoma cingulatum. Pp. 133-135 in Jensen, J. B., C. D. Camp, J. W. Gibbons, and M. J. Elliott (eds.). Amphibians and Reptiles of Georgia. University of Georgia Press, Athens. 575 pp.
Martof, B. S. 1968. Ambystoma cingulatum. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 57.1-57.2.
Martof, B. S. and H. C. Gerhardt. 1965. Observations on the geographic variation in Ambystoma cingulatum. Copeia 1965(3): 342-346.
Means, D. B. 1986. Flatwoods salamander. Pages 42-43 in Mount, R. H., ed. Vertebrate animals of Alabama in need of special attention. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn.
Means, D. B., Palis, J. G., and M. Baggett. 1996. Effects of slash pine silviculture on a population of flatwoods salamander (Ambystoma cingulatum). Conservation Biology 10:426-437.
Palis, J. G. 1996. Element stewardship abstract: flatwoods salamander (Ambystoma cingulatum). Natural Areas Journal 16(1): 49-54.
Palis, J. G. 1997. Breeding migration of Ambystoma cingulatum in Florida. Journal of Herpetology 31:71-78.
Pauly, G. B., S. H. Bennett, J. G. Palis, and H. B. Shaffer. 2012. Conservation and genetics of the frosted flatwoods salamander (Ambystoma cingulatum) on the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Conservation Genetics 13: 1-7.
Pauley, G. B., O. Piskurek, and H. B. Shaffer. 2007. Phylogeographic concordance in the southeastern United States: the flatwoods salamander, Ambystoma cingulatum, as a test case. Molecular Ecology 16:415-429.
Seyle, W. 1994. Distribution and status of the gopher frog (Rana capito) and flatwoods salamander (Ambystoma cingulatum) in Georgia. Unpublished Report to Fish and Wildlife Service. 18pp.
Stevenson, D. J., and A. E. Davis, Jr. 1995. A summary of rare herpetofaunal species surveys - Fort Stewart Inventory. . The Nature Conservancy Fort Stewart Inventory. Unpublished Report to U.S. Department of Defense.. 21pp.
Vickers, C. R., L. D. Harris, and B. F. Swindel. 1985. Changes in herpetofauna resulting from ditching of cypress ponds in the Coastal Plain flatwoods. Forest Ecology and Management 11: 17-29.
Vitt, L. J. 1981. A survey of the status, distribution and abundance of potentially threatened and endangered vertebrate species in Georgia, Part II: reptiles and amphibians. Unpublished Report to Georgia Department of Natural Resources. 210pp
Whiles, M. R., J. B. Jensen, J. G. Palis, and W. G. Dyer. 2004. Diets of larval flatwoods salamanders, Ambystoma cingulatum, from Florida and South Carolina. Journal of Herpetology 38:208-214.
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of endangered status for reticulated flatwoods salamander; designation of critical habitat for frosted flatwoods salamander and reticulated flatwoods salamander: Final Rule. Federal Register 74(26): 6700–6774.
Thomas M. Floyd and Dirk J. Stevenson
J. Jensen and D. Stevenson, March 2009: original account
T. Floyd, December 2018: account revision
