Loading profile...

Loading profile. Please wait . . .

Etheostoma duryi Henshall, 1889
Blackside Snubnose Darter

Photo by Noel Burkhead. Image may be subject to copyright.
range map button NatureServe button Report Button About button

Federal Protection: No US federal protection

State Protection: Rare

Global Rank: G4

State Rank: S2

Element Locations Tracked in Biotics: Yes

SWAP 2015 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN): Yes

SWAP 2025 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN): Yes

2025 SGCN Priority Tier: High Conservation Concern

Element Occurrences (EOs) in Georgia: 7

Habitat Summary for element in Georgia: Small to medium streams, gravel to cobble bottoms; riffles and pools


Description

The blackside snubnose darter grows to a maximum length of 70 mm (2.8 in), with a blunt snout typical of the "snubnose darter" group. Eight to nine dark saddles cross the tan dorsum and about 9 dark blotches form a midlateral stripe; the fourth dorsal saddle is often the darkest and may extend ventrally to the midlateral stripe. The venter is pale yellow. A small orange spot occurs at the front of the first dorsal fin, and a black teardrop descends below the eye. Males are slightly larger than females. Breeding males have a green throat and chin, an orange breast and belly, and brick red pigmentation in the dorsal fins.

Similar Species

The blackside snubnose darter is very similar to the snubnose darter (Etheostoma simoterum). The snubnose darter has a narrow but distinct frenum (vs. no frenum), two separate spots in the middle of the caudal fin of juveniles (vs. a single median caudal spot or median caudal spots fused together in juveniles), and a more steeply sloping (i.e., blunt) snout.

Habitat

The blackside snubnose darter inhabits small creeks and rivers, living in pools and slowly moving riffles with gravel, cobble, boulder or bedrock substrata.

Diet

Benthic aquatic insects.

Life History

Spawning occurs from March to early May. The aggressive males may chase one another and follow females as they search for a site to attach their eggs. The accompanying male embraces the female in an S-shaped position to fertilize the eggs as the female lays them one by one on the surfaces of rocks. Sexual maturity is reached at age one and the maximum life span is likely three years.

Survey Recommendations

This species is vulnerable to standard sampling methods such as seining and backpack electrofishing. Nuptial males should be photographed with their fins erect, which can facilitate accurate identification.

Range

The blackside snubnose darter is found only in the Tennessee River drainage in Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, and extreme northeast Mississippi. In Georgia, this species is restricted to the Chickamauga Creek watershed in the northwest corner of the state. Check the [Fishes of Georgia Webpage](http://fishesofgeorgia.uga.edu/index.php?page=speciespages/species_page&key=ethedury) for a watershed-level distribution map.

Threats

Habitat degradation in small streams, including accelerated erosion and sedimentation caused by land-disturbing activities, poses the greatest threat to the blackside snubnose darter.

SWAP 2025 Threat Matrix

Threat 1 Threat 2 Threat 3
General Threat Pollution Pollution None
Specific Threat Agricultural & forestry effluents Domestic & urban waste water None

Georgia Conservation Status

The blackside snubnose darter is only represented by a handful of occurrences in the Chickamauga Creek watershed. However, it has been collected in the early 2000s in both the Chickamauga and Lookout Creek systems.

Conservation Management Recommendations

Conserving populations of the blackside snubnose darter depends on maintaining and improving habitat quality in small streams by eliminating sediment runoff from land-disturbing activities such as roadway and housing construction, maintaining and restoring forested buffers along stream banks, eliminating inputs of contaminants such as fertilizers and pesticides, and maintaining natural patterns of stream flow. Watershed clearing and urban development can lead to unnaturally flashy stormwater runoff, which scours stream channels and results in lower baseflows.


SWAP 2025 Conservation Actions:

  • Action 1: Minimize impacts of urbanization on aquatic SGCN and habitats
  • Action 2: Provide technical and financial assistance to farmers/landowners to protect stream buffers and wetlands, minimize runoff of sediment and pollutants, and protect habitat from livestock trampling
  • Action 3: Create West Tennessee River partnership to conserve aquatic SGCN and habitats
  • Action 4: Assess SGCN fishes and fish communities in highest priority watersheds

References

Boschung, H. T. and R. L. Mayden. 2004. The Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Institiute, Washington,. 736 pp.

Etnier, D. A., and W.C. Starnes. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. Univ. Tennessee Press, Knoxville. 681pp.

Page L.M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico, 7th edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 34: 137, 139.

Mettee, M. F., P. E. O'Neil, and J. M. Pierson. 1996. Fishes of Alabama and the Mobile Basin. Oxmoor House, Birmingham. 820pp.

Page, L. M. and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. 432pp.

Authors of Account

Byron J. Freeman and S. Mitchell

Date Compiled or Updated

B. Freeman, 1999: original account

B. Albanese, Dec 2009: added similar species, conservation status, and minor edits

S. Mitchell.  Feb, 2019: general update of entire account. 

Squirreltown Creek (Tennessee Basin), Dade Co., GA 26 July 2017 Photo by Kelly Strychalski (Georgia DNR)